Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +3571%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2304
Shading Units
48
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
G94B
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy