Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +4272%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2304
Shading Units
48
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT216
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy