Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +2029%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
96
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
49W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF108
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy