Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +670%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM
0.743 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK208
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy