Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +861%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2304
Shading Units
240
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT200B
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy