Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +35%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2020
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 14
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy