Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +245%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jul 2019
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
640
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy