Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +43%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Fiji
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy