Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
4024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG +6437%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
4096
Shading Units
72
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT215
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy