Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG +3285%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Jul 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
112
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G92B
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy