Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG +2476%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy