Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +2343%
10.75 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR4
2048bit
Memory Bus
512bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
R600
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy