Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +394%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy