Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +652%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Bonaire
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy