Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +169%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
2048
224
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
274W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy