Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +975%
10.75 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV770
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy