Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8500 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +36968%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8500 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G86
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
G86-300-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy