Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +2484%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
3584
Shading Units
128
224
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
135W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G92
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy