Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V520 +1081%
7.373 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2020
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
480
144
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
14.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.373 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
460.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 12
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 12
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.716 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy