Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (28GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 158W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO V710 +4403%
27.65 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

28GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
224bit
Memory Bus
256bit
504.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

54
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3456
Shading Units
512
216
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
54
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
54 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
432.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
55.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
27.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
864.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

158W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Cayman
Navi 32
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy