Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
-
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV380
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Rage 9
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy