Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +472%
5.728 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
-
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
800
144
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV770
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy