Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1190MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +224%
2.437 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
940 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
1024bit
Memory Bus
64bit
307.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
76.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
4.874 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
2.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
152.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
Topaz
Vega 12 XLA
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.55 billion
Unknown
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy