Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2.437 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +22%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
1024bit
Memory Bus
256bit
307.2GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
76.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
4.874 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
152.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
Amethyst
Vega 12 XLA
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy