Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1350MHz vs 863MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +734%
11.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 765M
1.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GK106
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy