Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1531MHz vs 1350MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +1310%
11.06 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2019
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
1519 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
256
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GP108
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy