Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1350MHz vs 1266MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +89%
11.06 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2016
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy