Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1468MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +1409%
12.03 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Blender
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +763%
622
GeForce MX250
72
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

93.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
375.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
24.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
12.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
751.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GP108B
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy