Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +223%
12.03 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
-
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

93.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
375.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
24.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
12.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
751.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Amethyst
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy