Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +2158%
14.09 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
480
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

475W
TDP
50W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
Turks
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 5.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy