Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (236W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +2165%
14.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
236W
850 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy