Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1720MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +1380%
14.09 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
65W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 5.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy