Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA T600

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1720MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +724%
14.09 TFLOPS
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
Blender
Radeon Pro Vega II +183%
824
T600
291
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
TU117
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

475W
TDP
40W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy