Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5500 +904%
5.224 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
-
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
400
88
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

125W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Redwood
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy