Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5500 +159%
5.224 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
-
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
1440
88
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Cypress
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy