Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1855MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5500 +83%
5.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jul 2020
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1408
Shading Units
896
88
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy