Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5500 +776%
5.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
-
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1408
Shading Units
240
88
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
289W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy