Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +9690%
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV620
Navi 24
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy