Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +502%
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Redwood
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy