Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +2%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy