Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (2040MHz vs 1425MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +186%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy