Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +245%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
768
Shading Units
336
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.450 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
907.2 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GF104
Navi 24
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy