Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +88%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2019
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy