Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 44W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
44W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV535
Navi 24
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy