Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2040MHz vs 1762MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +15%
3.133 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
12
RT Cores
6
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GA107
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy