Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD FirePro M2000

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M +552%
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2012
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy