AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2040MHz vs 1335MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+30%
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1512 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
