Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2040MHz vs 1006MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M +508%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2017
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
256
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GM108S
Navi 24
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy