Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2331MHz vs 1837MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +1634%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon Pro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16896
48
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GB100
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
208 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

50W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy