NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

128 additional rendering cores

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2331MHz vs 1665MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650

2.984 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro W6400 +19%

3.58 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1650 +50%

12

Radeon Pro W6400

8

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1650 +40%

28

Radeon Pro W6400

20

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1650 +20%

42

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce GTX 1650

VS

Radeon Pro W6400

Graphics Card

Apr 2019

Release Date

Jan 2022

GeForce 16

Generation

Radeon Pro

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz

Base Clock

2331 MHz

1665 MHz

Boost Clock

2331 MHz

2001 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

64bit

128.1GB/s

Bandwidth

112.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

12

14

SM Count

-

896

Shading Units

768

56

TMUs

48

32

ROPs

32

-

RT Cores

12

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

1024 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

L3 Cache

8 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

74.59 GPixel/s

93.24 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

111.9 GTexel/s

5.967 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

7.161 TFLOPS

2.984 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

3.580 TFLOPS

93.24 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W

TDP

50W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

Navi 24

TU117-300-A1

GPU Variant

Navi 24 XL-W

Turing

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

6 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

5.4 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.2

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro V340

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 550X 640SP

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster